TMS vs Point Solution

Build within the foundation, not on top of it

Point solutions bolt AI onto a legacy TMS that would rather they didn't exist. FreightSuite puts the agents inside the TMS — where they can do anything a person can, and can't be switched off by someone else's roadmap.

Request a demo FreightSuite vs CargoWise

Side by side

How they compare

	Point solution	FreightSuite TMS
Architecture	Sits on top of a legacy TMS via an adapter; only sees what the adapter exposes	Built into the TMSAgents work with the same data and functions as your people
System access	A narrow integration; a handful of endpoints at best	Over 1,000 internal APIsAnything a person can do in the system, an agent can do
Cost model	Billed transactionally, on top of what you already pay for the TMS	Included in the platformOne system, one contract
Return	Incremental; limited to the single process it automates	CompoundingEvery job, every workflow, every team on one system
Improvement to the business	Minimal; the legacy architecture underneath stays the same	StructuralOperations, finance and sales move together
Deployment time	Fast to switch on, slow to integrate; often stalls at the adapter	Weeks, not monthsDeployed by people who have run a cutover
Human input required	High; people still stitch the point solution to the rest of the job	Exceptions onlyAgents carry the routine work end to end
Geographies	Often single-market; each region a new integration	Global from day oneMulti-office, multi-currency, multi-jurisdiction
Dependence on legacy	Total; lives or dies by the host system's roadmap and API policy	NoneFreightSuite is the system
Future-proof	At risk; the host vendor can restrict, replace or switch it off	PermanentThe agents are the product, not an add-on to it

The foundation

A point solution lives on a system that doesn't want it there

Most point solutions depend on a legacy TMS for their data and their access. That vendor has its own AI roadmap, and every reason to restrict the adapter, change the terms, or switch it off. Build your automation there and you're building on ground you don't own.

Access

Over 1,000 internal APIs. An adapter gives you a handful.

Because the agents live inside the TMS, they reach everything your people can. A point solution only reaches what the adapter lets through.

Anything a person can do

Quote, book, document, invoice, match, report. If it's in the system, an agent can do it.

Permanent, not permitted

The agents are part of the platform. There is no third party who can revoke their access.

Included, not invoiced

No per-transaction fees stacked on top of your TMS. One platform, one price.

Request a demo See the workflows

A system built today for tomorrow's forwarders

Build within the foundation, not on top of it

How they compare

A point solution lives on a system that doesn't want it there

Over 1,000 internal APIs. An adapter gives you a handful.

Stop renting automation. Own it.